Mattia Bellucci vs Jiri Lehecka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When it comes to second serve points, Lehecka holds a slight edge with a 47.26% win rate compared to Bellucci's 42.09% over the last six months. Could this give Lehecka a crucial advantage?
• In terms of returning second serves, Lehecka again has the upper hand, winning 42.29% of points, just ahead of Bellucci’s 41.56%. Will this consistency in return give Lehecka an edge?
• Bellucci performs marginally better on first serve returns, winning 22.23% compared to Lehecka’s 22.02%. How much impact could this have on the outcome?
• Both players have comparable breakpoint performance, with Bellucci saving 55.68% and Lehecka 55% of breakpoints. Does this indicate both players are evenly matched under pressure?
• Lehecka shows a better overall match win percentage in the past year, standing at 62.3% compared to Bellucci’s 58.23%. Is consistency over the year tipping the scales in Lehecka's favor?
• Bellucci shines on Hard courts with a 66% win rate, while Lehecka favors Clay, winning 63% of matches. On which surface could this match gain significance?
• Lehecka has competed against higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 56.44, compared to Bellucci’s opponent average of 156.99. Does this suggest Lehecka is more battle-tested?
• Both players have an identical deciding set performance, winning 47% of these crucial moments. Could their mental toughness play a role in determining the winner?
• Lehecka is more efficient in converting breakpoints, with a conversion rate of 30.33%, over Bellucci’s 22.41%. Could Lehecka’s effectiveness in breaking serve be the deciding factor?

Editorial Prediction (July 2, 2025, UTC):

Both Bellucci and Lehecka come into this match with strengths and weaknesses that can influence the outcome. Bellucci's highest proficiency is on Hard courts, while Lehecka has a better track record on Clay. This surface dominance could play a pivotal role in the match proceedings.

Lehecka's ability to win more second serve points and return second serves slightly better than Bellucci suggests he might have the upper hand in enduring rallies. Additionally, facing higher-ranked players over the past year possibly equips Lehecka with greater experience and resilience under competitive circumstances.

However, Bellucci's consistent performance on Hard courts, his preferred surface, could mitigate some of Lehecka’s advantages, especially if the match unfolds with court conditions favoring his play style.

Although both players are equally adept in handling deciding sets, Lehecka's higher efficiency in breakpoint conversion might prove vital in crucial game moments.

Overall, Lehecka is slightly favored to win this upcoming match, given his superior second serve handling, higher-ranked opponent experience, and improved break point conversion. Bellucci's prowess cannot be underestimated, especially on his favored surface, but Lehecka's recent form and competitive edge might just set him apart.